Conflict resolution in the workplace follows six steps: address the issue early, talk in private, listen to understand, name the problem instead of the person, build options together, then agree on next steps and follow up. The same steps work for disagreements between peers, between a manager and an employee or between teams. Most people will need them at some point. In a November 2025 Acas survey, 44% of working adults in Great Britain said they had experienced conflict at work in the past year, the highest level Acas has recorded.
Conflict resolution is the process of settling a disagreement so people can keep working together. It doesn't require everyone to end up happy or agree on everything. It means the problem gets named, a decision gets made and people know what happens next.
Not all conflict is harmful. Task conflict, such as a debate over which vendor to choose, can lead to better decisions. Relationship conflict, such as resentment or personal friction, rarely helps and tends to spread. Good conflict resolution keeps disagreements focused on the work.
Most workplace conflict starts with a handful of causes. Spotting the cause first points you to the right fix.
These six conflict resolution steps work whether you're one of the people in the disagreement or the manager helping two others work it out.
Address It Early
Small issues grow when they go unspoken. Raise a concern within a day or two, while it's still about one event instead of a pattern.
Try saying: "Do you have 15 minutes today? I want to talk about how the handoff went on the client report."
Choose a Private Setting and the Right Channel
Hard conversations belong in a private meeting or a call, not a group chat or an email thread. Text strips out tone, which makes tension worse. Save writing for the follow-up, not the argument.
Try saying: "This is easier to sort out live. Can we jump on a quick call?"
Listen to Understand
Let the other person explain their view without interrupting. Then summarize what you heard before you share your side. People calm down once they feel heard.
Try saying: "So from your side, the deadline changed and no one told you. Is that right?"
Name the Problem, Not the Person
Describe the specific behavior and its effect. Avoid labels like "careless" or "difficult," which put people on the defensive.
Try saying: "When the report came in Friday afternoon, I didn't have time to check the numbers before Monday's meeting."
Build Options Together
Ask for ideas before you offer your own. People are more likely to follow a solution they helped create.
Try saying: "What would make this work better for both of us next time?"
Agree, Document and Follow Up
Close with a specific agreement: who does what, by when. Send a short recap, then check in a week or two later.
Try saying: "So you'll send drafts by Wednesday and I'll return comments by Thursday. Let's check in next Friday to see how it's going."
How to handle conflict at work depends partly on who's involved. Here is how the steps apply in three common situations.
Peer to Peer
Two coworkers disagree about who should present the team's results. Neither has authority over the other, so the goal is a fair agreement both can accept.
Opening line: "I think we both want to present, and that's fine. Can we figure out a split that works for the team?"
Manager to Employee
A manager notices an employee pushing back in meetings and missing deadlines. The power gap makes listening even more important, so the manager starts with questions.
Opening line: "I've noticed some tension in our last few meetings. I'd like to understand what's going on from your side."
Cross-Team
Marketing and operations clash over launch dates. Each team has valid constraints, so the fix usually involves a shared decision-maker or a clear rule for setting priorities.
Opening line: "Our deadlines are colliding. Can we lay out both timelines and decide together what moves?"
The steps above only work if you can carry them out under pressure. Five conflict resolution skills do most of the work:
Like any skill, conflict resolution improves with practice. Each conversation you handle well makes the next one easier.
The Thomas-Kilmann model describes five ways people respond to conflict. Each style fits some situations better than others.
| Style | What it looks like | When it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Avoiding | Stepping away from the issue | Minor issues, or when emotions need time to cool |
| Competing | Pushing for your own position | Urgent decisions or safety concerns |
| Accommodating | Giving the other person what they want | When the issue matters more to them than to you |
| Compromising | Each side gives up something | When time is short and both goals matter |
| Collaborating | Working together on a solution that meets both needs | Important issues where the relationship matters |
Most people lean toward one or two styles out of habit. Pryor Learning's guide to personality and conflict managing style explains how personality shapes those habits.
Some situations go beyond a disagreement. Bullying, harassment, discrimination and threats aren't conflicts to talk through. They call for escalation.
If you see warning signs:
Pryor's Confronting Workplace Conflict is a one-hour webinar that teaches you how to spot conflict triggers early, choose the right channel for hard conversations, set boundaries when coworkers turn sarcastic or passive-aggressive and repair trust with clear agreements. To strengthen the listening and communication skills behind conflict resolution, try Interpersonal Communication Skills. Browse all communication training courses, or take unlimited in-person and virtual seminars with PryorPlus.